Is AI Really Leveling the Playing Field for All?
Midjourney and DALL-E: Montage by Curt Doty
Artificial Intelligence has been touted as a tool to level the playing field, but the reality is more complex. The original sin of AI’s development—scraping the internet for data—means it has inherited all the biases of that data, including those related to race and marginalized communities. AI systems are only as unbiased as the information they are trained on, and the internet is riddled with systemic inequalities, misinformation, and historical biases.
One of the clearest examples is facial recognition technology, which struggles with identifying people of color accurately, often leading to false arrests and misidentifications. These systems, used by law enforcement, perpetuate racial inequalities by disproportionately targeting African Americans and other minority groups. Another example is AI-driven predictive policing tools, which rely on historical crime data that often reflect biased policing practices. These systems end up over-policing certain communities, further marginalizing them.
Access to AI tools is another major issue. Many marginalized communities lack reliable broadband or Wi-Fi access, limiting their ability to benefit from AI’s potential. This digital divide only reinforces existing inequalities, as AI becomes another tool that is more accessible to those already in positions of privilege.
Healthcare AI has shown similar bias. Algorithms designed to prioritize patient care have been found to underestimate the health needs of Black patients because they use healthcare costs as a proxy, which inadvertently favors those who can afford more comprehensive care. This leads to lower-quality care for socioeconomically disadvantaged groups, reinforcing health disparities.
Hiring algorithms, another area where AI could have been a force for good, also reflect existing biases. AI systems trained on historical hiring data have shown favoritism toward white candidates, excluding qualified minority applicants. The AI learns from past decisions that reflect existing workforce inequalities, further entrenching these disparities.
Sentiment analysis, used in social media and customer service, misinterprets the language and dialects commonly used by African American or minority communities, leading to biased assessments. This can harm customer interactions and negatively affect public relations for companies employing these tools.
In conclusion, while AI has the potential to drive progress and inclusion, it is not yet leveling the playing field for all. Until we address the biases embedded in AI's development and ensure equal access to its benefits, it risks reinforcing the very inequalities it was meant to overcome.
Sources: The unseen Black faces of AI algorithmsAbout the Author
Curt Doty specializes in branding, product development, social strategy, integrated marketing, and UXD. He has extensive experience on AI-driven platforms MidJourney, Adobe Firefly, ChatGPT, Murf.ai, and DALL-E. His legacy of entertainment branding: Electronic Arts, EA Sports, ProSieben, SAT.1, WBTV Latin America, Discovery Health, ABC, CBS, A&E, StarTV, Fox, Kabel 1, TV Guide Channel, and Prevue Channel.
He is a sought after public speaker having been featured at Streaming Media NYC, Digital Hollywood, Mobile Growth Association, Mobile Congress, App Growth Summit, Promax, CES, CTIA, NAB, NATPE, MMA Global, New Mexico Angels, Santa Fe Business Incubator, EntrepeneursRx and AI Impact. His AI consultancy RealmIQ helps companies manage the AI Revolution.
© 2024 Curt Doty Company LLC. All rights reserved. RealmIQ is a division of the Curt Doty Company. Reproduction, in whole or part, without permission of the publisher is prohibited. Publisher is not responsible for any AI errors or omissions.
