RealmIQ

View Original

Hollywood's Response to the Taylor Deepfake Scandal

MidJourney: Curt Doty

A Deep Dive into Synthetic Media's Legal Landscape

The recent uproar surrounding the Taylor Deepfake scandal has catapulted the conversation about synthetic media and deepfakes into the limelight, prompting Hollywood and its governing bodies to take a stand. The Screen Actors Guild (SAG-AFTRA), representing thousands of film and television actors, has been at the forefront of addressing these concerns. This blog post explores Hollywood's reaction to the scandal, the legal agreements made by SAG-AFTRA, and the potential legal actions victims can pursue.

Hollywood's Reaction

Hollywood has reacted with a mix of outrage, concern, and calls for regulation following the Taylor Deepfake scandal. The incident, which involved the unauthorized use of AI to create realistic but entirely fabricated images or videos of individuals, in this case, a well-known celebrity, has raised significant ethical and legal questions. The entertainment industry, known for its tight-knit community, has rallied together to demand stronger protections for individuals' digital likenesses.

In response to the scandal, there has been a noticeable increase in awareness and discussion around the topic of synthetic media. Industry leaders, including producers, directors, and actors, have engaged in public discussions, panels, and interviews, emphasizing the need for ethical guidelines and legal frameworks to govern the use of such technology.

SAG-AFTRA's Legal Stance

SAG-AFTRA has been instrumental in negotiating protections for actors against the unauthorized use of their digital likenesses. Recognizing the potential for abuse and exploitation, the guild has aggressively pursued legal safeguards. Here's what SAG agreed to legally:

  1. Consent Requirement: The guild has secured agreements requiring explicit consent from actors before their images or likenesses can be used to create synthetic media. This means that producers and companies must obtain permission from actors before using AI to alter their appearance or generate performances digitally.

  2. Compensation and Credit: In cases where actors' likenesses are used to create synthetic performances, SAG-AFTRA has negotiated for appropriate compensation and credit for the actors involved, akin to traditional roles.

  3. Right to Refuse: Actors have been given the right to refuse the use of their likenesses for synthetic media purposes, particularly if the content is deemed damaging to their reputation or is something they are not comfortable being associated with.

  4. Protection and Enforcement: The agreement includes mechanisms for protection and enforcement, allowing the guild to take legal action against entities that violate these terms.

Legal Actions for Victims

For individuals who find themselves victims of unauthorized deepfake creations, there are several legal actions they can pursue, though the landscape is still evolving:

  1. Right of Publicity Claims: Individuals can file lawsuits based on the violation of their right of publicity, which protects against the unauthorized commercial use of an individual's name, likeness, or other recognizable aspects of one's persona.

  2. Defamation: If a deepfake is damaging to an individual's reputation, they may have grounds for a defamation lawsuit, especially if the content is false and presented as real.

  3. Privacy Laws: Invasion of privacy claims can be made, particularly if the deepfake involves private or sensitive content being distributed without consent.

  4. Copyright Infringement: In cases where a deepfake uses copyrighted material (such as a performance by an actor), the copyright holder may pursue copyright infringement actions.

The Taylor Deepfake scandal has served as a wake-up call, propelling Hollywood and legal bodies to confront the challenges posed by synthetic media. While the industry and lawmakers work to catch up with the rapidly evolving technology, the legal agreements and potential actions outlined above represent initial steps toward protecting individuals from unauthorized and potentially harmful uses of their digital likenesses. I think the bigger scandal is right wing media creating scandals about Taylor amidst a misogynist backdrop of hate and fear.

About the Author

Curt Doty specializes in branding, product development, social strategy, integrated marketing, and UXD. He has extensive experience on AI-driven platforms MidJourney, Adobe Firefly, Bard, ChatGPT, Colossyan, Murf.ai, and DALL-E. His legacy of entertainment branding: Electronic Arts, EA Sports, ProSieben, SAT.1, WBTV Latin America, Discovery Health, ABC, CBS, A&E, StarTV, Fox, Kabel 1, TV Guide Channel, and Prevue Channel.

He is a sought after public speaker having been featured at Mobile Growth Association, Mobile Congress, App Growth Summit, Promax, CES, CTIA, NAB, NATPE, MMA Global, New Mexico Angels, Santa Fe Business Incubator, EntrepeneursRx and AI Impact. He is now represented by Ovationz. His most recent consultancy RealmIQ helps companies manage the AI Revolution.

© 2024 Curt Doty Company LLC. All rights reserved. RealmIQ is a division of the Curt Doty Company. Reproduction, in whole or part, without permission of the publisher is prohibited. Publisher is not responsible for any AI errors or omissions.